TRB's 103rd Annual Meeting

Transportation Research Board’s 103rd Annual Meeting
01.07.2024 – 01.11.2024
Washington, DC

Shant Boyajian, Bernadette Duran-Brown, Christine Ryan and Ann-Therese Schmid participated in the Transportation Research Board’s 103rd Annual Meeting that took place January 7 – 11, 2024 in Washington, DC.

On January 7th, Ann-Therese participated in a panel leading a workshop on “Open Book Negotiations 101: Strategies and Challenges.” The transportation industry is moving toward an increased use of Alternative Contracting Methods (ACMs), such as Progressive Design-Build (PDB), Construction-Manager at Risk (CMR) and Public–Private Partnerships (P3s). These ACMs are mostly based on open-book negotiations during the pre-construction or pre-development period. This workshop focused on a) the concept of open-book negotiations, b) the benefits of open-book negotiations in mitigating risk, c) challenges faced and successful practices to address them, d) the parameters and constraints in which negotiations occur and e) case studies where various open-book negotiations were implemented. This workshop also included a hands-on hypothetical scenario for the participants to work on.

Ann-Therese and Christine participated in a panel addressing “Alternatives to Fixed Price Contracts” on January 8th. This session discussed how the market for large infrastructure projects has undergone numerous changes in the past several years, one of which is an increasing aversion by some contractors and service providers to the traditional fixed-price contract model. Contractors are seeking alternatives to lump sum pricing. This panel of industry experts discussed the current state of the market for construction and service projects and the resulting impacts on contractor availability and competition. The discussion included popular alternatives to lump-sum pricing and contractual mechanisms to mitigate the associated risks, as well as procurement options related to contractor selection methods and alternative delivery methods involving negotiated pricing.

Also on January 8th, Shant presented “Charging Ahead: Exploring the Unexpected Challenges of Electric Vehicle Adoption.” This session addressed how industry and government have major goals for the widespread adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) across the 2020s and beyond. The speed and scale of adoption raises underappreciated legal and policy issues: How can stakeholders manage consumer expectations and educate consumers on the realities of EV performance and capabilities, while also engaging with other road users on the realities of sharing the road with EVs? What will EVs demand of infrastructure? How can industry and government address the current lack of charging capacity, the likely increase in demand for electricity, and the potential for increased wear and tear on infrastructure caused by heavier EVs? How concerned should stakeholders be about greenwashing in the EV industry?

Christine addressed “Post Covid Impacts to Supply Chain and Labor Challenges” on January 9th. This session focused on how the transportation construction industry is experiencing unprecedented supply chain disruptions and labor shortages, resulting in cost increases and delays to the development of transportation infrastructure projects and operation of services contracts. Panelists discussed how various contract models traditionally address labor and materials supply and relief for contractors. The panel also explored different legal and contractual mechanisms that agencies are employing to address both contractor and owner concerns regarding current supply chain and labor challenges. This session provided guidance regarding legal and contractual issues that arise, as well as applicable federal requirements.

Bernadette discussed “Are Public Safety and Equity Mutually Exclusive” on January 9th. The de-facto accommodation of homeless encampments within highway right-of-way have stirred many passions on many sides of the issue. There are an almost unlimited number of competing (and sometimes conflicting) legal mandates surrounding this issue. The encroachment of people living within right-of-way creates obvious safety concerns for the travelling public and those seeking shelter within right-of-way. There are often issues of sanitation, mental health and crime within these encampments that raise concerns. There are also, however, questions of equitable treatment of people who are displaced by things beyond their control such as affordability and loss of employment. A discussion of the complex legal framework that surrounds these issues was the purpose of this presentation.

Twitter/X Facebook LinkedIn
Jump to Page

Nossaman LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek