Overview
Paul Weiland is chair of Nossaman’s Environment & Land Use Group. He focuses his practice on litigation, permitting, and compliance counseling. Paul’s clients include public agencies, publicly regulated utilities, private developers, large landowners, and trade associations. He counsels them regarding land use, endangered species, wetlands, water quality, air quality, climate change, green building, transportation, and hazardous substances issues.
Paul litigates environmental and natural resources matters at the trial and appellate court levels. His experience includes litigation involving the Administrative Procedure Act, Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, Endangered Species Act (ESA), Federal Land Policy and Management Act, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), National Forest Management Act, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and Wilderness Act.
Prior to joining Nossaman, Paul worked in the Law and Policy Section, Environmental and Natural Resources Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. There, he was lead counsel for the United States in a number of high profile trial and appellate cases. He assisted federal agencies in the formulation of policies and rules and has drafted comments on proposed legislation regarding the ESA, federalism and preemption, the NEPA, regulatory reform, small business, defense, and transportation.
Paul regularly comments on news, events, and policies affecting endangered species issues in California and throughout the United States on the Firm’s Endangered Species Law & Policy blog.
Experience
Experience
LITIGATION
Maine Lobsterman’s Association v. National Marine Fisheries Service, D.D.C. Case No. 21-cv-2509. Counsel of record for State of Maine Department of Marine Resources as intervenor-plaintiff challenging a biological opinion issued by NMFS with respect to the Atlantic lobster fishery and several other fisheries.
Conserve Southwest Utah v. Department of the Interior, D.D.C. Case No. 21-cv-1506. Represent Washington County, Utah as intervenor-defendant in a case challenging federal approvals for the Northern Corridor Project, a 4.5 mile highway project in Washington County north of the City of St. George, as well as for a regional habitat conservation plan.
Humane Soc'y of the United States v. Kienzle, 333 F. Supp. 3d 1236 (D.N.M. 2018). Represented New Mexico Game Commission and New Mexico Department of Game and Fish as defendants in a case alleging violation of Endangered Species Act section 9 by the Department in light of the hypothetical risk that listed jaguars and wolves could be caught in traps set for other animals (primarily coyotes). We narrowed the case with a motion to dismiss then ultimately prevailed in cross motions for summary judgment.
Union Neighbors United v. Jewell, 831 F.3d 564 (D.C. Cir. 2016). Served as lead litigation counsel for client, Buckeye Wind LLC, which was pursuing permits for a 100-turbine wind energy project in Ohio. The United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit rejected plaintiff-appellants claims that the Fish and Wildlife Service violated the Endangered Species Act in issuing an Incidental Take Permit for the project, but the court agreed with plaintiff-appellants that the Service violation the National Environmental Policy Act by failing to consider a sufficiently comprehensive range of alternatives. The matter has been remanded to the Service to conduct additional environmental analysis.
Wild Equity Institute v. City and County of San Francisco, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 4854 (9th Cir. March 25, 2015). Represented defendant City and County of San Francisco in an action alleging violation of section 9 of the ESA. Obtained grant of motion to dismiss action as moot as well as denial of motions for preliminary relief and summary judgment in the trial court. The Ninth Circuit dismissed the appeal as moot.
REGULATORY & COMPLIANCE COUNSELING
City of Ventura. Assist client with the development of a strategy to respond to a petition to list the Southern California steelhead under the California Endangered Species Act, including preparation of comments on the petition and development of a strategy to delay action on the listing and seek Commission direction to staff to work with stakeholders to develop a 2084 regulation.
Kern County Water Agency. Counsel client regarding the development of a $15+ billion infrastructure project (Delta Conveyance Project) to improve water supply reliability for 25 million Californians and address seismic and climate change-related risks while fulfilling federal and state Endangered Species Act and California Environmental Quality Act and National Environmental Policy Act requirements.
City of Oakland. Special counsel to the City advising with respect to collection, storage, transportation, and disposal of hazardous materials including hazardous wastes abandoned by residents and businesses within the City. In this capacity, Nossaman is helping the City respond to an enforcement action by the California Attorney General and Alameda County District Attorney alleging violations of multiple California laws regarding the proper management and disposal of hazardous substances including by negotiating tolling agreements, settlement terms, and supplemental environmental projects.
Siskiyou County. Counsel client regarding the proposal to remove four dams on the lower Klamath River. In this capacity, we are litigation counsel to the County and are representing the County in proceedings before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the California Public Utility Commission, and the State Water Resources Control Board. Engage in negotiations with the Department of the Interior, the California Natural Resources Agency, and the Klamath River Renewal Corporation. Advise client with respect to the NEPA, CEQA, and federal and state wildlife laws, including those that provide protection for the Lost River and shortnose suckers.
Dairy Cares. Worked with client team to evaluate petition to list tricolored blackbird under the California Endangered Species Act including by assessing the legal and scientific bases for the petition. Represent client in front of the California Fish and Game Commission and Department of Fish and Wildlife.
PRO BONO
Ukrainian resettlement effort. Support California businesses, non-profits, and individuals seeking to host Ukrainian refugees who entered the United States via Mexico following the Russian invasion of Ukraine by providing counseling and drafting agreements between hosts and their Ukrainian guests.
Afghan Humanitarian Parole Effort. Represent three Afghan families seeking humanitarian parole in the United States in the wake of the U.S. withdrawal from and Taliban takeover of Afghanistan.
Dennis Murphy, Ph.D. Represented noted conservation biologist Dennis Murphy in a legal challenge in federal district court to a U.S. Forest Service hazardous fuel reduction project initiated without environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act that led the agency to halt and ultimately abandon the project.
Insights
Publications
Blog Posts
Speaking Engagements
News
Multimedia
Paul Weiland was interviewed on Air Talk radio (an NPR affiliate based in Southern California) regarding the California Fish and Game Commission’s recent decision to list four native bees as candidates to become endangered species.
Paul Weiland, Chair of Nossaman’s Environment & Land Use Group, shared his views with KJZZ radio (an NPR affiliate based in Phoenix) on the ESA as well as the frustrations many landowners have experienced.
Organizations
Community & Professional
University of California, Davis, Adjunct Faculty
American Bar Association, Section on Energy, Environment, and Resources
Harvard Law School Association, Environmental Law Section
Indiana University, School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Distinguished Alumni Council
Honors
Honors & Recognitions
Named a Top 100 Lawyer by the Daily Journal, 2021
Environmental MVP, Law360, 2021
Named an Energy & Environmental Trailblazer by the National Law Journal, 2021
Listed, The Legal 500 United States, Industry Focus - Environment - Litigation, 2019-2022
Listed, The Legal 500 United States, Industry Focus - Energy - Renewable/Alternative Power, 2020-2022
Individual recognition for Environment, Chambers USA, 2017-2018
Named one of California's Top 25 Land-Use Attorneys in 2011 by Daily Journal
Selected to the Super Lawyers list for 2010-2018
Selected to the Rising Stars list for 2008-2009
Awarded Attorney General’s Distinguished Service Award in 2005 by U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft
Practices
Education
- Harvard Law School, J.D., 1999, Heyman Fellowship
- Indiana University, Ph.D., 1996, Center for Urban Policy and Environmental Dissertation Fellowship, School of Public and Environmental Affairs Doctoral Fellowship
- University of Southern California, B.A., 1992, magna cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa National Honor Society, All-USA College Academic Team
Admissions
- California
- Massachusetts
- U.S. Supreme Court
- U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
- Supreme Court of California
- U.S. District Court, Central District of California
- U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California
- U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
- U.S. District Court, Southern District of California
- U.S. District Court, District of Colorado
- U.S. District Court, District of Columbia
- U.S. District Court, District of New Mexico
- U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas